Sep 29, 2012

Oscar Predictions Round 2: Acting Categories

You can see the index of all predicted categories here.

Best Actress
1. Jennifer Lawrence (Silver Linings Playbook)
2. Quvenzhané Wallis (Beasts of the Southern Wild)
3. Marion Cotillard (Rust & Bone)
4. Naomi Watts (The Impossible)
5. Helen Mirren (Hitchcock)
Alternative: Mary Elizabeth Winstead (Smashed)

Jennifer Lawrence is the biggest addition to this category after the Toronto festival gave her film a major boost. Some pundits have already chalked her up as the winner, which sounds a bit premature to me, but hey, it’s not like anybody else here looks like they can take the gold man home. Mary Elizabeth Winstead’s film was well-received at Sundance but she didn’t exactly look like a nominee until it became clear that the fall festival trifecta was not going to give us any new contenders other than Lawrence, so now she’s back in the race. I wonder if Smashed is going to be big enough to get her major notices though. She’ll surely be the film’s only nomination, so having not seen the film yet, I wonder if her performance is strong enough to make that happen. On the other hand, I don’t see the Academy nominating two French-speaking performances in the same year either, so Emmanuelle Riva’s going to have a really tough battle. Is she going to campaign for it? If not her or Winstead, then who? Keira Knightley (Anna Karenina) is the most obvious answer, but for now, I’m guessing the divisive reaction to her film will leave her out, which will leave us with Helen Mirren, who’s just recently been added to the race with Hitchcock.

Best Actor
1. Joaquin Phoenix (The Master)
2. John Hawkes (The Sessions)
3. Daniel Day-Lewis (Lincoln)
4. Denzel Washington (Flight)
5. Anthony Hopkins (Hitchcock)
Alternative: Jean-Louis Trintignant (Amour)

Joaquin Phoenix gives the best performance of his career and he’s got the nomination all locked up. I’m fairly confident there’s nothing standing in Hawkes’ way either. He’s well-liked in the industry and he’s playing an incredibly baity role masterfully. Fox Searchlight’s insistence on releasing Hitchcock this year tells me they’ve seen something truly special in it and it may well be Hopkins’ performance as the Master of Suspense.
Could I be underestimating Hugh Jackman’s chances for Les Misérables though? We all know how well he can sing and that’s as good a role as they come. Or what about Bradley Cooper? If everybody around him is getting attention for the film and he’s good in it, why not?


Best Supporting Actress
1. Anne Hathaway (Les Misérables)
2. Amy Adams (The Master)
3. Helen Hunt (The Sessions)
4. Maggie Smith (The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel)
5. Sally Field (Lincoln)
Alternative: Samantha Barks (Les Misérables)

This category is just... boring this year. I’m looking forward to Hathaway’s performance but I’m also worried that it might not live up to the hype. If that happens to be the case, who can take this category? Amy Adams is certainly primed for a win after several nominations. She’s in an acclaimed film and although her performance is not as revelatory as her co-stars, she’s dependably great. Then there’s Helen Hunt, who’s really strong in her film, but can’t hold a candle to any of the winners from the past decade. Could Barks surprise us all?
I know it’s way too early to be talking about the win, but this category is so lacklustre it leaves nothing to discuss.


Best Supporting Actor
1. Phillip Seymour Hoffman (The Master)
2. Robert De Niro (Silver Linings Playbook)
3. Alan Arkin (Argo)
4. Matthew McConnaughey (Magic Mike)
5. Russell Crowe (Les Misérables)
Alternative: Michael Pena (End of Watch)

Phillip Seymour Hoffman is without a doubt a co-lead in The Master. I think if Weinstein decides to campaign both actors as leads, we’ll be looking at our first double nominees in that category since Amadeus. There’s no way either of these two performances will be left out. If Hoffman is campaigned here, though, I can’t see anyone else winning. Again, too early to talk about wins when the nominations are still a few months away, but really, the performance is that strong.
Robert De Niro is getting the best reviews he’s had in about two decades, so he’s likely to factor in the race. Alan Arkin seems to be the one supporting actor from Argo who’s on everyone’s lips. I’d imagined it’d be Bryan Cranston but that doesn’t seem to be the case. The big question for me is whether the ecstatic reviews for End of Watch will force the distributor to campaign for Gyllenhaal and Pena.

7 comments:

  1. Oh these are solid picks through and through. I really hope they push Phoenix for lead and Hoffman for supporting, that's the way it should be.

    Again, not sure about Quvenzhané Wallis. She was recently declared ineligible for a SAG nom, so that doesn't help her chances at all. Such a shame, she was perfect.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Alex.

      I updated these before the SAG news came out, but still I wonder if it won't turn out to be like ineligible screenplays for WGA, where the Academy ignores the guilds voting. It could certainly hurt, given the small scale of the film, but who knows.

      As for Hoffman though, I'm curious why you think he's supporting. I really think they're playing it off each other and their characters are equally important in the narrative's progression. Think about it this way, if Phoenix was a woman, would Hoffman become the male lead or would he still be supporting?

      Delete
    2. Just tweeted you back. I should've elaborated. They are both definitely lead performances, no question. My comment reads wrong on that point.

      What I meant was that the Academy is, by and large, nonsense, so for either Phoenix and/or Hoffman to have a shot, they need to NOT run against one another. It worked out for Abraham in Amadeus, but that was a long time ago. Very different Academy now, you know?

      Delete
    3. Gotcha. Yeah, politically speaking, I think Weinstein will side that way. But if there's ever been a film since Thelma and Louise that deserves the double lead noms, it's this one. And I can't pick a favourite either. Both are equally strong in my opinion.

      Delete
    4. Yup, completely agree. My immediate reaction is to hail Phoenix as the better of the two, but then I remember PSH bitching that would-be detractor out at the party. Too close to pick one over the other. If they ARE in the same acting category, that'll be a damn hard choice to make.

      Delete
  2. I'm going for Zoe Kazan for Best Actress but that's never going to happen. Also, I'm on Team PSH too. There's something I love about consistence stoicity that he conveys. Joaquin proves himself eventually but it's not an instantaneous connection with him.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Do you offer any predictions on unemployment? Do you think structural unemployment will be resolved? Do you think the President's stimulus for the economy will make a difference.

    I have setup some websites for You. Let's visit and relax with us:
    predict science
    prdictions
    who is edgar casey
    cayce edga
    are edgar cayce
    what is the environment
    environment topics
    environment
    seminar topics
    water pollution
    topics on the environment
    topics for environment

    ReplyDelete