http://amiresque.blogspot.com/p/about-me.html

Showing posts with label Movie Mezzanine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie Mezzanine. Show all posts

Feb 16, 2014

Girl on a Bicycle

Grade: D

This review was originally published at Movie Mezzanine.

Hollywood has always had the tendency to rehash recipes that are proven to taste like magic to the audience. One can argue that such filmmaking is understandable when the financial stakes are high with big budget studio blockbusters, but it’s disheartening when this lack of originality plunges an entire genre into the farthest depths of mediocrity. Nowhere is this more evident than in the modern rom-com, a genre that ranks only above the found footage subgenre of horror in terms of success-to-dud ratio. So entrenched are rom-com’s hackneyed tropes that some filmmakers don’t bother to tinker with them altogether, regularly assuming that their audience will derive pleasure from seeing what they’ve responded to for decades. The result is often films that scream their entire plotline in the first few minutes and are devoid of any romance or comedy. Such is the case with Jeremy Leven’s Girl on a Bicycle, an ill-conceived story of love in the face of language barriers across the EU.

Paolo (Vincenzo Amato) is an Italian tour bus driver in Paris, hell bent on exposing the Italian influence on every single Parisian landmark he introduces to the poor souls that step in his bus. His fiancée, a German stewardess named Greta (Nora Tschirner), travels frequently due to the nature of her job and has formed a passive-aggressively close friendship with a French captain called Francois (Stéphane Debac), though one senses the writers missed a real opportunity by not casting the Spanish Javier Bardem and calling him Don Juan. Paolo’s best friend is Derek (Paddy Considine), an Englishman who spends his days playing the guitar and practicing French. If you’re keeping track, that’s four nationalities so far, bringing together an eclectic cast of accented English speakers. The fifth piece of the puzzle is Cécile (Louise Monot), the French girl to whom the title refers.

When we first meet Paolo, he proposes to Greta in an intimate restaurant but in a matter of days, he’s fallen hard in love upon first glance with Cécile, who just happens to bike around the same route, at the same time, every single day, as Paolo’s bus. Paolo’s love for Greta never falters but he begins to second-guess his decision to settle down. Derek advises that “there will always be some girl on a bicycle while there is only one Greta” but Paolo’s doubts remain. At the same time, Francois is trying his hardest, while pretending to be nonchalant, to seduce Greta into a one night stand. Meanwhile, we learn that Cécile is an up and coming actress performing in commercials. This is communicated through a scene wherein she continuously struggles to hold a slippery soap in her hands and lets it slide, fly through the room and hit the director in the face, not once or twice, but until his face is bruised and bloodied. Such is the extent to which the film’s humor aspires to entertain. Scenes that couldn’t have possibly seemed funny even in the screenwriter’s head materialize on the screen and overstay their welcome. The comedy is neither funny, nor provocative. It’s entirely harmless, but also inexcusably dull.

The turning point in the narrative finally arrives when Paolo, in his search for Cécile around the streets, fails to notice her taking a turn in front of him and hits her with the bus. She loses her job with a broken arm and a leg; he loses his because of incompetence and in the process, finds that Cécile is actually a single mother of two. Doing what any reasonable man in his position would, Paolo decides to hide the incident from Greta and instead take care of Cécile and her children on his own secretly. The children who have never seen their father and have been told he is in a far away land slaying dragons believe that Paolo is their father who has finally returned.

With all these ingredients in place, Girl on a Bicycle sets off on a path to check every single cliché box that one can think of in the run of the mill, modern rom-com. Wisecracking children who teach adults what they never realized was right in front of them? Check. The lothario that learns the key to happiness is in abiding by society’s monogamous norms? Check. The incredibly attractive woman whose inexplicable, borderline offensive ineptitude at every aspect of life keeps her single until the final scene? Check. The best friend who drops the occasional cheap wisdom? Check. Poorly written, one dimensional female characters? Check. Yet, none of these are the film’s gravest sin, for as unacceptable as they truly are, we have become so accustomed to them as to be desensitized. The real travesty is elsewhere.

From the opening scene, Girl on a Bicycle falls into an unfortunate trap it can never quite escape from: its humor feels entirely forced and predominantly based on national stereotypes. If formulaic jokes about European clichés – Germans are efficient and organized, the French are romantic and consider themselves better at “love” than everyone else, Italians are proud of their architecture and speak in animated gestures, the British love their beer – feel fresh and even slightly comical, then Girl is an amusing enough Valentine’s treat. If you’ve heard these jokes before and didn’t even find them funny the first time around, Lord have mercy on your soul. They are repeated over and over again throughout this film. They are brought up as characters joke with one another or fight, whether they have sex with each other or just a drink. At every occasion, in line at a hotel, on the speaker in an airplane, in the film’s most dramatic or light-hearted moments, it is these immediately irritating quips that are meant to drive the comedy.

Worse yet, all of this is at the service of a screenplay that is otherwise entirely predictable and founded on unlikely accidents. If the relationships seems impossible and the emotions and laughs unearned, it is because the filmmakers have done little to contextualize any event in their plot. Midway through the film, Paolo says to Cécile that life is just a series of unpredictable accidents. Girl on a Bicycle’s script takes that drop of wisdom as its guiding principle. If you know better and you want your hard earned relationship with your significant other to remain unharmed, this film is not a Valentine’s Day memory you would want to keep.

Feb 4, 2013

Monday's Words of Wisdom


Fellow Torontonian, Corey Atad, who writes at Movie Mezzanine has discussed the responsibility of documentarians to stick to facts in their films in a piece titled 'Honesty in Documentary'. The discussion is prompted by his experience with Searching For Sugar Man after he found a number of details were omitted from the film. I'm writing about it because no piece this year has changed my opinion of a film as much Corey's has. I simply cannot look at Sugar Man the same way anymore.

In essence, there is nothing wrong with being innovative in documentary cinema. It is appreciated, in fact. John Grierson, one of the earliest pioneers of the form, referred to his own aesthetics as the "creative treatment of actuality." Corey mentions examples of other films that present their story creatively, bringing up Waltz With Bashir as a great example, but he's asking whether that type of creative control over the material is allowed extend to the facts therein.
"Anytime we walk into a film we are making an implicit agreement. If I go see a fictional film I expect that it will be a fiction. I suspend my disbelief and allow the story to do what it wants. When I walk into a documentary, that agreement is different. There is an implicit expectation that no matter how much slant or bias or editorial influence is being had on the subject, at the very least the film is presenting factual information as accurately as possible. Sometimes accuracy is difficult to achieve, but distorting facts is a no-no."
When I watched the film myself, I was quite taken with it. I find it heartbreaking and heartwarming in equal measure, but I was quite surprised at how Rodriguez remained completely unfazed by his new found success. Though the omissions aren't huge, the fact that Rodriguez had been aware of his success in places like Australia explains why he wasn't at all shocked by the warm reception he received in South Africa.In Corey's words: "The fact is, Rodriguez was not as obscure as the film claims, nor was he as difficult to find as the documentary implies. It’s not an outright lie, but it is a lie by omission, and the information was clearly left out in order to juice the drama in Rodriguez’ story. It’s still an incredible story, just not as incredible as the filmmakers would have you believe going on their account alone."

I can't help but feel cheated a bit, having realized that my emotional reaction to the film wasn't entirely merited, and I've slowly and quietly slipped Sugar Man out of my top 20 films. You can read Corey's piece here. I couldn't recommend it enough.


Next up is perennial favourite, Nick Prigge of Cinema Romantico, who has summed up the narratives overtaking this year's Oscar race in a 100% accurate, 137% hilarious piece titled 'Emerging Oscar Storylines.' I don't agree with his predictions entirely: I refuse to believe Argo can win best picture until I see Affleck jumping up and down on the Oscar stage with a little golden man in his hands and I don't think Tommy Lee Jones is a lock. Then again, I've predicted both of those categories exactly like him, so what the hell is up with my disingenuous disagreement? I am, however, entirely consumed by the idea that Michael Haneke may have an agenda of snuff films.
"The story of Best Actor is that there is NO story. Daniel Day Lewis will win. He will win because he floats in the regal ether above the pedantic stories of the Academy. Hype rolls off of him. Backlash is frightened to death of him. Twitter is powerless to stop him. Daniel Day Lewis is Daniel Fucking Day Lewis and that is why he will win."

You can read his piece here, and if you don't, you deserve the same twitter hate attack as Anne Hathaway.